1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC70 (217 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |
