1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1620 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | XC90 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |