1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Ford F-350
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-350 weights approximately 648 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 6801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 362 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 6240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 110 L |
