1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2006 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 766 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Hyundai |
Model | 2CV | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |