1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 985 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | 2CV | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 72 L |