1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2008 Dodge Dakota is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | 2CV | Dakota |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 83 L |