1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 973 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | 2CV | CR-V |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1533 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 58 L |