1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 76 L |
