1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 528 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Citroen | Volkswagen |
| Model | 2CV | Polo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1088 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1682 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
