1967 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ak 350 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Ak 350 | Epica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |