1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2004 Renault Megane
To start off, 2004 Renault Megane is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Megane weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1967 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2004 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Megane |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |