1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen Ami | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 59 L |
