1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 544 kg more than 1967 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |