1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Stilo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Fiat Stilo (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 790 kg more than 1967 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2008 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | Ami | Stilo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |