1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1967 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Ami | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |