1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (368 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1967 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ami | Charger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 368 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |