1967 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Ami | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |