1967 Citroen DS vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1968 Jaguar 240 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1967 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1967 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen DS | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | DS | 240 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |
