1967 Citroen DS vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Citroen DS (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Citroen DS weights approximately 680 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen DS | 2008 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | DS | Nano |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 37 L |
