1967 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (32 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 723 kg more than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 569 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (41 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Dyane 6 | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 32 HP | 380 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1323 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 95 L |
