1967 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2005 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (32 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Explorer weights approximately 680 kg more than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (41 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2005 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Dyane 6 | Explorer |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 32 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 85 L |