1967 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2008 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 527 kg more than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hyundai Matrix (142 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (41 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2008 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Hyundai |
Model | Dyane 6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 32 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |