1967 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (32 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6. (41 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Citroen Dyane 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 32 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
