1967 DAF 44 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1967 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 681 kg more than 1967 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (221 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DAF 44. (65 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF 44 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 44 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |
