1967 DAF 44 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 DAF 44. (43 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 411 kg more than 1967 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DAF 44. (80 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF 44 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | DAF | Honda |
| Model | 44 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2436 mm |
