1967 DAF 44 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 DAF 44. (43 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1967 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DAF 44. (80 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF 44 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 2 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2489 mm |