1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | 12 M |
Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |