1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1962 DKW Junior
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 1962 DKW Junior is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 DKW Junior (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Junior weights approximately 40 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1962 DKW Junior | |
| Make | DAF | DKW |
| Model | Daffodil | Junior |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2180 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 31 L |
