1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar E-Type (265 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 585 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1966 Jaguar E-Type | |
Make | DAF | Jaguar |
Model | Daffodil | E-Type |
Year Released | 1967 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 63 L |