1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1969 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 534 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1969 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | DAF | NSU |
Model | Daffodil | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 82 L |