1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 323 (74 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 323 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | 323 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 45 L |
