1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1980 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 490 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | DAF | Plymouth |
| Model | Daffodil | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2260 mm |
