1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1983 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 1983 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chevrolet Blazer (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 786 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1983 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | DAF | Chevrolet |
Model | Daffodil | Blazer |
Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2560 mm |