1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1984 Toyota Cressida is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 445 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1984 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | Daffodil | Cressida |
Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 75 L |