1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1987 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1987 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Plymouth Sundance (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 515 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1987 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | DAF | Plymouth |
Model | Daffodil | Sundance |
Year Released | 1967 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |