1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1991 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 1991 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1991 Volkswagen Passat | |
| Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
| Model | Daffodil | Passat |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
