1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Daffodil | FTO |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 195 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1300 mm |
