1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1996 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 1996 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1996 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | Daffodil | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |