1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1998 Daihatsu Mira
To start off, 1998 Daihatsu Mira is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 745 cc (2 cylinders), 1967 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Daihatsu Mira (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Mira should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Daihatsu Mira weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Mira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 1998 Daihatsu Mira | |
Make | DAF | Daihatsu |
Model | Daffodil | Mira |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 659 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 40 L |