1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 548 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |
