1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Honda Z
To start off, 1999 Honda Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 745 cc (2 cylinders), 1967 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda Z (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda Z should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda Z weights approximately 300 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Honda Z | |
| Make | DAF | Honda |
| Model | Daffodil | Z |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 35 L |
