1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | Daffodil | Neon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |