1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | DAF | MG |
Model | Daffodil | X20 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |