1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | MM |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 106 L |
