1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2001 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Pontiac Grand Am (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Grand Am should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 770 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2001 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | DAF | Pontiac |
Model | Daffodil | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |