1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1219 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | Daffodil | Ram |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3530 mm |