1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Ram (235 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1806 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | Daffodil | Ram |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 4703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2466 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 132 L |
