1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 1133 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2004 GMC Safari | |
| Make | DAF | GMC |
| Model | Daffodil | Safari |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 191 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1793 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 102 L |
