1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,839 cc, 2005 Mazda Etude is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Etude (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Etude weights approximately 433 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Mazda Etude | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | Daffodil | Etude |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1093 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 55 L |