1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC70 (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | DAF | Volvo |
Model | Daffodil | XC70 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |